Senator Torricelli: AP must apologize of It's readers

People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) are most popular organization between Iranian people and all knows MEK as a supporter and advocate of Iranian people .

Following publish th Associated Press  reported  about Iranian resistance , the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran (PMOI/MEK) they have responsed to this event. as when i saw that was shoked Because i know well MEK .

In this way i read a letter  of Senator Robert Torricelli who has written the following brief response to the AP.

AP reporter falls victim to Iranian regime’s PR about peaceful opposition 

He knows MEK more than any one. He has wrote:

He wrote in the end of his letter to Editors of the Associated Press and asked him to apologys of MEK :

The Iranian regime has an active public relations presence in our country. It is their right to present information to the national dialogue. Your reporter, however, has fallen victim to it and done a great disservice to some very distinguished Americans united for the single purpose of regime change in Tehran.

An apology to them and your readers is in order. A further apology to the thousands of Members of the MEK who risked their lives to unveil Iran's secret nuclear program to American intelligence and worked tirelessly to report Iraqi IED locations to American soldiers during the Iraqi occupation is further demanded.

Rebuttal from the MEK in response to misleading associated press story

Rebuttal from the MEK in response to misleading associated press story

As shahin Gobadi has said : “The AP story, “Trump Cabinet pick paid by ‘cult-like’ Iranian exile group” of February 5, is a rehashing of old and long-debunked allegations aimed at disparaging the principal Iranian opposition group, the Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK) and its bipartisan supporters. The religious dictatorship ruling Iran and its lobby abroad have tried for years to discredit the Iranian opposition in an effort to proffer the appeasement of the ruling mullahs as a viable policy.”

really it is a shame for them who closes their eyes on facts. 

AP reporter Jon Gambrell ignored “facts regarding the conduct and history of the Iranian resistance. Instead of reporting the views of a large (number of) bi-partisan lawmakers in both chambers of the U.S. Congress, and the decisions by the highest U.S. and European Courts,…he has chosen to rely heavily on only two individuals, both of whom have been proponents of the appeasing (of) the murderous mullahs of Iran,” added Gobadi.
Information Gambrell presented about the day to day life at Camp Ashraf was not verified by the who have testified before Congress that allegations against the MEK were propaganda concocted by the Iranian regime’s intelligence services

The MEK remains a strong and cohesive organization, with a broad reach both worldwide and deep within Iran. MEK is the leading voice for democracy in Iran, supported by its interpretation of Islam that discredits the fundamentalist mullahs’ regime.

Tarnishing Image of MEK, Cornerstone of Iran Appeasement Policy

MEK Today

The MEK today is the oldest and largest anti-fundamentalist Muslim group in the Middle East. It has been active for more than a half century, battling two dictatorships and a wide range of issues. The MEK supports:

The reputation of the MEK is more than trying appeasers to tarnishing of the MEK

Tarnishing Image of MEK, Cornerstone of Iran Appeasement Policy

Here is a brief clarification of facts and some insight on the crux of the matter to set the record straight for the AP that  has so far failed to correct the many errors and misrepresentations of facts in a story a biased , distorted, and misleading story by Associated Press about the Iranian opposition. 
The AP story,   is a rehashing of old and long-debunked allegations aimed at disparaging the principal Iranian opposition group, the  MEK  and its bipartisan supporters.
The mullahs  regime and its lobby abroad have tried for years to discredit the Iranian opposition in an effort to proffer the appeasement of the ruling mullahs as a viable policy. Today, the crux of the matter is a choice between a firm policy vis-à-vis the clerical regime as the godfather of international terrorism and standing with the long-held desires of the Iranian people for freedom and democracy.

for understanding the rule of mullahs and his lobbies you can continue reading this response HIRE